matlab toolbox gift Search Results


gift toolbox for  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc gift toolbox for
Gift Toolbox For, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gift toolbox for/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gift toolbox for - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
schnitzcell matlab module  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc schnitzcell matlab module
Schnitzcell Matlab Module, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/schnitzcell matlab module/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
schnitzcell matlab module - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ica of fmri toolbox  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc ica of fmri toolbox
Ica Of Fmri Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ica of fmri toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica of fmri toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fmri toolbox gift matlab software  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc fmri toolbox gift matlab software
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Fmri Toolbox Gift Matlab Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fmri toolbox gift matlab software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmri toolbox gift matlab software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gifti toolbox  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc gifti toolbox
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Gifti Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gifti toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gifti toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
custom-written script in  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc custom-written script in
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Custom Written Script In, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom-written script in/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom-written script in - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
platform ica toolbox  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc platform ica toolbox
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Platform Ica Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/platform ica toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
platform ica toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ica fmri toolbox (gift) software  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net ica fmri toolbox (gift) software
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Ica Fmri Toolbox (Gift) Software, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ica fmri toolbox (gift) software/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica fmri toolbox (gift) software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab 2014b  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab 2014b
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Matlab 2014b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab 2014b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab 2014b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
lempel–ziv–welch (lzw) algorithm  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc lempel–ziv–welch (lzw) algorithm
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Lempel–Ziv–Welch (Lzw) Algorithm, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lempel–ziv–welch (lzw) algorithm/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lempel–ziv–welch (lzw) algorithm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fmri toolbox  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc fmri toolbox
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Fmri Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fmri toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmri toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ift toolbox for  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc ift toolbox for
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Ift Toolbox For, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ift toolbox for/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ift toolbox for - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: BOLD-fMRI scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.

Journal: Epilepsia open

Article Title: Intrinsic brain network stability during kainic acid-induced epileptogenesis.

doi: 10.1002/epi4.70002

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: BOLD-fMRI scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.

Article Snippet: 2.3.1 | Identification of main network (MN) using group ICA Group- level BOLD- fMRI data were analyzed using GICA in the Group ICA of FMRI Toolbox (GIFT) Matlab software to identify MNs during brain resting state.29 This involved setting 20 independent components (ICs), conducting a two- step principal component analysis (PCA) reduction, and using the Infomax algorithm with ICASSO for component analysis.30 After ICA decomposition, F I G U R E 1 Research flowchart of our proposed study. nloaded from https://onlinelibrary.w iley.com /doi/10.1002/epi4.70002 by IN A SP - N E PA L , W iley O nline L ibrary on [25/02/2025].

Techniques: Control